![]() |
Konstantin Melnikov, ‘Green City’, 1930 |
In [SA] n.1/2, 1930, Barsch and Ginzburg wrote:
“When a man becomes
sick, he can be cured with adequate medicines. It would however be more
productive and less expensive to avoid illness manifesting itself. Just in this
consists the socialist medicine: prophylaxis. When the city is ugly, when
namely it is what it is, with all its attributes: noise, dust, lack of light,
air sun, etc., we draw on medicines: homes and villas in the country, health
resorts, rest homes, green cities. All this is medicine, a medicine which is necessary when a city exists,
which we cannot avoid. But we cannot close our eyes in front of this double
system of poison and antidote, which is the classical capitalist system of
contradictions. This system must be contrasted by the socialist system of
prophylaxis, the system of the elimination of the city, with all its specific
attributes, promoting a settlement sodality of man able to solve the problems
of work, of rest, of his culture, as a whole and uninterrupted process of
socialist being.”
During the socialism in the Soviet Union many utopian ideas for the city
planning had been proposed. These ideas were to reproduce the revolutionary
society of Soviet Union which was totally different from the capitalism city
planning.
One of these proposals was the idea of ‘disurbanism’, the design of a
dispersed city between urban and rural life. The architects designed modular
buildings distributed along infrastructural viability axes determined by the
location of productive facilities. Mikhail
Barsch and Moisei Ginzburg on 1930 proposed the transfer of public enterprises
into external locations, the transformation of the freed-up spaces into parks
and the dispersion of Moscow citizens along the roads, linking the city with the
rural population. Along the different proposals for Moscow another one was Konstantin Melnikov’. He designed a new radical system for
Moscow where electric trains could distribute the workers along the city.
He also designed a laboratory of sleep where workers could rest from their daily labor. According to
his beliefs sleep was the most important part of regeneration of workers and
he proposed to redesign the city according to that idea.
How would the center of Moscow look if the above Utopia would become a reality? As the years pass
political and socioeconomic changes occur. However, the major problem
associated with the residence of the growing number of citizens remain.
How are we going rebuild our cities in order to create a better place for
living? How are we going to decongest the city centers from millions of
people that reside in them?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.